Precursors: Beyond
scope of model |
Possible Emergence: Ardipithecus ramidus About 4.5 million years ago |
Products: Increased Dexterity Phonology |
References and other reading |
Biewener, A.A. (1990). Biomechanics of mammalian
terrestrial locomotion. In Science, 250, 1097–1103. |
Carrier, D. (2011). The Advantage of Standing Up to
Fight and the Evolution of Habitual Bipedalism in Hominins. In PLoS ONE 6:5, e19630. |
Lovejoy,
C. O. (1981). The
Origin of Man. In Science 211:4480. |
Pontzer, H. (2017). Economy and endurance in
human evolution. In Current Biology 27, R613–R621. |
Discussion |
Habitual
Bipedalism refers to locomotion on two legs as primary means of movement and
the regular use of a bipedal gait. Habitual bipedalism is a defining
characteristic of modern humans and we stand alone amid over 200 extant
primate species as obligate bipeds, such a uniquely human feature that
skeletal adaptations to obligate bipedalism are used in tracing the
development of our extinct hominid ancestors. Whilst skeletal adaptions are
documented in early hominids there are varying accounts explaining the
success of the bipedal gait in humans. This is opposed to Facultative
bipedalism observed in animals today, which is performed on a temporary
basis, usually in response to exceptional circumstances Pontzer (2017) postulates that habitual bipedalism
facilitates economy and endurance in early Hominins; particularly benefits to
walking economically that allowed greater range of hunting without increased
calorie costs. This allowed energy to be redirected to reproductive efforts;
increased brain size and longer life spans, all metabolically expensive
traits unique to humans. Pontzer’s (2017) approach
builds on Biewener’s (1990) research showing how
well-equipped humans are for long distance running compared to our
Chimpanzees relatives. Benefits to hunting and scavenging from endurance
running lead to the hypothesis those endurance capabilities were the drive for
the dramatic anatomical changes brought about by Habitual Bipedalism. Carrier
(2011) proposes the evidence of numerous quadruped species using their
forelimbs to fight is evidence that a bipedal posture offers a range of
motion that is advantageous to fighting. The bipedal gait orientates
forelimbs from pronograde (horizontal) to orthograde (upright) and
repositioning the bodily axis allows quadrupeds to grapple, strike and defend
with greater capacity, as the range of motion now produces the most force.
Striking downward increases power in retractor muscles, which produce
positive movement associated with acceleration as opposed to protractor
muscles primarily responsible for ‘braking’. These observations lead to
Carrier’s (2011) prediction that mammals strike with greater capacity from a
bipedal posture, particularly striking upwards and that humans developed
Habitual Bipedalism due to its efficiency in performing aggressive acts. Lovejoy
(1981) traces bipedalism to its social origins, claiming how males supplied
food to females to gain mating access and this component of social behaviour
requires use of the hands. Considerable
debate persists regarding the timing and ecological context surrounding
bipedalism, with discussion becoming ‘fossil driven’ and focused on mapping
taxa. Reconciling physical adaptions with environmental and social changes
will further explain the how and why of human bipedalism. Nicholas
Papadopoullos, 2019 |